The objectives of this article on the study of good agricultural practice policy (GAP) are: 1. To study the factors affecting the implementation of the Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) policy and 2. To suggest guidance. Good Agricultural Policy (GAP) practice, which is an academic article. The authors analyzed and compiled lessons from the lessons learned at the commercial subcommittee. In the Commission on Commerce and Intellectual Property 11-12 House of Representatives on the issue of Guidelines for Promoting Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) to raise the quality of agricultural products. As an advisor to the Subcommittee on Commerce There has been additional studies from various sources of information. The results of the study are as follows: 1. The study of factors affecting the implementation of the Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) policy has four factors: 1) Getting certification involves a complex process. This is contrary to the general practice of farmers. 2) Barriers to distribution. 3) Insufficient inspectors, 4) consumers lack understanding of food safety, and 5) exporters demand more certified products. This is a major obstacle to the implementation of the Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) policy. 2. Guidance Guidance on the implementation of the Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) policy. Safe agricultural products are as follows: 1) The government should push to make agricultural products safe as a national agenda. 2) Accelerate the development of personnel / staff involved in advising and verifying the certification. Produced in accordance with Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) 4) the creation of a third generation of awareness of agricultural products and food safety and 5) incentive measures for new farmers to comply with good agricultural practice standards (GAP), however, the private sector should provide expertise in the distribution and manufacture of products that meet the Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) standards.